Perfect vs Monopolistic Competition: Key Differences

If a market were in perfect competition, the competition between sellers would regulate prices so well that both buyers and sellers would be as satisfied with prices as they could be. Additionally, the constant competition between the various sellers would help drive the market forward, prompting invention and innovation among the creators. At this point, the market would be so well balanced that no single buyer or seller could destabilize it.

Sometimes, however, a government will establish a perfect competition and monopolistic competition. monopolistic market to ensure national interests or maintain critical infrastructure. For instance, many utilities such as power companies or water authorities may be granted a monopoly status for a certain area. The slope of the demand curve in perfect competition is horizontal, which shows perfect elastic demand.

Discover learning materials with the free Vaia app

Due to differentiated products, firms have some degree of market power, which leads to a mark-up of price over marginal cost, thus causing allocative inefficiency. Moreover, because firms don’t produce at the minimum point of their average total cost (ATC) curve (excess capacity), there’s productive inefficiency as well. A market situation where a large number of buyers and sellers deal in a homogeneous product at a fixed price set by the market is known as Perfect Competition. In other words, in a perfectly competitive market, the sellers sell homogeneous products at a fixed price determined by the industry and not by a single firm. In the real world, the situation of perfect competition does not exist; however, the closest example of a perfect competition market is agricultural goods sold by farmers. Goods like wheat, sugarcane, etc., are homogeneous in nature and their price is influenced by the market.

Key Takeaways:

Perfect Competition represents an idealized market with homogenous products and price-taking firms, ensuring maximum efficiency. In contrast, Monopolistic Competition, reflects real-world markets where firms differentiate their products, exercise some degree of pricing control, and rely on branding and advertising. An oligopoly describes a market structure that is dominated by only a small number of firms that serve many buyers. The firms can either compete against each other or collaborate (see also Cournot vs. Bertrand Competition).

Principles of Economics 3e

By doing so, they can use their collective market power to drive up prices and earn a higher profit. That is because there will always be some barriers to entry, some information asymmetries, larger and smaller competitors, and small differences in product differentiation. If it existed, it would drive prices to the perfect balance between the wants of buyers and sellers. The competition between producers drives prices down to the lowest level that pleases both consumers and producers. In summary of the above, Monopolistic competition can be viewed as a cross between perfect competition and pure monopoly.

Furthermore, perfect competition assumes that consumers have perfect knowledge about prices and product quality, and there are no barriers to entry or exit for new firms. Examples of perfect competition include agricultural markets where farmers sell standardized crops, and stock exchanges where multiple buyers and sellers trade identical shares. In a market that experiences perfect competition, prices are dictated by supply and demand. Firms in a perfectly competitive market are all price takers because no one firm has enough market control. Unlike a monopolistic market, firms in a perfectly competitive market have a small market share.

• On the contrary, monopolistic competition doesn’t achieve neither allocative nor productive efficiency in the long run.
• The slope of the demand curve in a monopolistic show a downward trajectory, which is a representation of elastic demand.
• Our mission is to empower people to make better decisions for their personal success and the benefit of society.
• According to economic theory, when there is perfect competition, the prices of goods will approach their marginal cost of production, or the cost of producing one additional unit.
• Due to homogeneous goods and perfect market knowledge, no single firm can influence the price, making all sellers price takers.

They don’t spend much on advertising or branding as, ideally, the product can’t be differentiated. In between a monopolistic market and perfectly competitive market lies monopolistic competition. In monopolistic competition, there are many producers and consumers in the marketplace, and all firms only have a degree of market control. In contrast, whereas a monopolist in a monopolistic market has total control of the market, monopolistic competition offers very few barriers to entry. All firms are able to enter into a market if they feel the profits are attractive enough. Hence, entry and exit of firms and the adjustment of output levels—driven by the zero-profit condition— would bring the market back to equilibrium.

• Monopolistic competition is defined as a market with many competitors with unique products or services competing for customers.
• Perfect Competition represents an idealized market with homogenous products and price-taking firms, ensuring maximum efficiency.
• Firms in monopolistic competition engage in product differentiation, branding, and advertising to attract customers and create a distinct market identity.
• The latter is what business owners need to understand if they want to comprehend what it takes for their businesses moving forward.
• As stated earlier, this particular topic is one of the very prominent topics covered extensively in microeconomics.

The purpose of Perfect Competition is to illustrate a market scenario where all firms sell an identical product, are price takers, and have no ability to influence the market price. In both market structures, economic profits can be made in the short run, serving as a signal for other firms to enter the market. Similarly, an increase in market demand would also lead to higher output and a higher price in the short run in monopolistic competition, much like it would in perfect competition. Even though firms in monopolistic competition have some degree of market power, the elasticity of demand does constrain them somewhat. However, under monopolistic competition, the number of firms is only so large that an individual firm does have the power to change the price of its product, especially under the condition of product differentiation. On the contrary, if a firm in perfect competition cuts down the price, it goes out of the market itself.

With structured courses, expert-led sessions, and practical case studies, upGrad makes complex economic concepts accessible and applicable to real-world scenarios. Quickonomics provides free access to education on economic topics to everyone around the world. Our mission is to empower people to make better decisions for their personal success and the benefit of society. As a rule of thumb, we say that an oligopoly typically consists of about 3-5 dominant firms. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance degree from Bridgewater State University and helps develop content strategies.

The graphs representing perfect and monopolistic competition also reflect different short-run and long-run outcomes. In both market structures, in the short run, firms can earn positive or negative economic profits. Over time, these profits (or losses) signal other firms to enter (or exit) the market. However, the long-run equilibrium outcomes differ substantially due to the key differences in the two markets.

Monopolistic and perfect competition are two economic models that illustrate the market interactions of producers, consumers, and other firms. Monopolistic competition is defined as a market with many competitors with unique products or services competing for customers. Perfectly competitive markets have so little product differentiation that anyone can sell their goods to any customer at the same price without affecting supply. This type of competition, therefore, further explores the balance between efficiency, incentivizing innovation and meeting diverse consumer preferences.

Introduction to Game Theory in Business and Economics

This is important to note because it is the only market structure that can (theoretically) result in a socially optimal level of output. It is important to note that not all of these market structures exist in reality; some of them are just theoretical constructs (which can be really useful in economics sometimes). Nevertheless, they are critical because they help us understand how competing firms make decisions. In continuation with the issue of efficiency in production, it has been shown that capacity utilization under monopolistic competition is lower than that under perfect competition. It means that under monopolistic competition, there is underutilization of capacity, i.e. there is excess capacity under monopolistic competition, whereas there is none under perfect competition.

What Are the Differences Between Monopolistic Markets and Perfect Competition?

The process of reaching this equilibrium, however, is influenced by the nature of the market structure. A monopolistic market and a perfectly competitive market represent two market structures that have several key distinctions in terms of market share, price control, and barriers to entry. In a monopolistic market, there is only one firm that dictates the price and supply levels of goods and services, and that firm has total market control. A perfectly competitive market is composed of many firms, where no one firm has market control. On the contrary, monopolistic competition doesn’t achieve neither allocative nor productive efficiency in the long run.

All firms produce at the minimum point of their average total cost curves, achieving productive efficiency. This equilibrium is represented graphically as the intersection point of the firm’s marginal cost and average total cost curves with the market price. In the realm of microeconomics, the concepts of perfect competition and monopolistic competition occupy substantially different domains. However, both of them possess the attribute of a ‘long-run equilibrium’, a state wherein no economic factors provoke firms to alter their output or exit/enter the market.

Do firms in monopolistic competition face long-term profits like monopolies?

In perfect competition, consumers have no brand preference because all products are identical. On the other hand, in monopolistic competition, consumers have a variety of products to choose from, but prices are usually higher due to differentiation and a degree of monopoly power. An example of perfect competition in real life is the agricultural goods market such as the market for wheat. This market has multiple sellers and buyers, homogeneous products (all wheat is the same), free entry and exit for producers, and sellers are price-takers. In purchasing raw cooking ingredients like vegetables, which is a perfectly competitive market, consumers go for the best quality at the lowest price, with little concern for the sellers’ identity. However, when buying takeout from one of the many fast-food restaurants, the specific brand and its offerings significantly influence the choice due to the monopolistic competition in the industry.

Barriers to entry are relatively low and allow firms to enter and exit easily. Contrary to a monopolistic market, a perfectly competitive market has many buyers and sellers, and consumers are able to choose where they buy their goods and services. Barriers to entry are relatively low and firms can enter and exit the market easily. Contrary to a monopolistic market, a perfectly competitive market has many buyers and sellers, and consumers can choose where they buy their goods and services. Perfect competition refers to a market structure where many firms offer the same product or service, buyers and sellers have perfect knowledge, and it’s easy for new firms to enter the market.